The nuclear promise is dazzling; the actual performance is stellar. So what's the problem?
As discussed in previous blogs, the advantages of nuclear power are too good to ignore, and the performance of the first 400+ commercial nuclear power plants and an even greater number of naval nuclear propulsion plants worldwide, over nearly half a century, is equally impressive. So, what's the problem? Why is the subject controversial?
The stated concerns include:
1. Nuclear plants just cost too much..
2. Some of the "nuclear waste" stays toxic for thousands of years.
3 The used fuel contains material that might be convertible to a bomb.
4. There might be casualties that could spread dangerous quantities of radioactivity.
5. Shipping radioactivity might lead to spills that would endanger the public.
6. Buildup of radioactivity might end up in contaminating the earth.
We'll start tackling these concerns one at a time, starting with cost. We'll dig out the relevant facts, challenge some of the common assumptions, refer you to some good cost data and analyses, and invite your comments I'd like to see if we can come to some degree of agreement, and deal with your comments fully, before we move on to the next concern.
Are you with me, so far? Stay tuned.



I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog.
Posted by: ugg boots | February 03, 2010 at 04:45 AM
Wow, thanks for the insightful post. I look forward to reading more from you.
Posted by: ugg boots | February 03, 2010 at 05:06 AM