« A Plea for Common Sense on Fukushima | Main | DON'T CENSOR THE INTERNET! »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a011570a7a11d970b0162fc8a7384970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Are Permissible Radiation Limits Set?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

There is a willing amalguame made regarding the external radiations, which damages had been studied because of the use of radioactive substances for radiology and even welding radiography, and internal radiation or contamination by ingestion of radioactive substances, which had only been studied by few specialists in Chernobile!!
Of course, internal radiation is what will bring most harm to japanese; a substance that can harm someone from a distance, how to say when it lays nearby one's heart cells or brain sells?
Better to get more informed about the topic, instead of being mislead.

No offense, but i suggest admin adding a google+ button for easy share!

Impressive blog! -Arron

Like the blog, appreciate the share!

announcing that no amount of radiation is small enough to be harmless was certainly effective in creating and nurturing phobic fear of radiation, when none was justified by the facts.

Thanks a lot for sharing this nice and informative post, This posts shows your efforts that how do you cover any topic research. I really like your blog because your blog has updated posts on different current issues. I would request you to keep sharing your thoughts.


I'm still mastering from you, but I'm trying to obtain my objectives. I certainly appreciate looking at all that is placed on your website.Keep the details arriving. I beloved it.

Radiation expert Professor Wade Allison, author of “Radiation and Reason,” has cast the question in a new light. He suggests, let’s set the permissible radiation limit the same way we set all other safety limits. Not by asking how little radiation we can get by with, but how much can we safely permit? There’s no intention of lowering the safety margin, and it will not be lowered. That’s not the issue. It’s a matter of working with the scientific data, rather than from a generic fear not supported by the science.

I like your post. It is good to see you verbalize from the heart and clarity on this important subject can be easily observed. hormone replacement

"Most people are benefited by radiation and not harmed? Perhaps they should review their conclusion against their studies about nuclear radiation.Since when a nuclear radiation has been helpful or beneficial in the history of humanity?

The comments to this entry are closed.